By Our Reporter
In a world where public accountability is pivotal, Volunteer Uganda Extra Limited (VUEL), an organization dedicated to fighting corruption, protecting human rights, and ensuring legal and financial transparency, has stepped up to demand accountability from Lwengo’s Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) Lujumwa Nathan and Community Development Officer (CDO) Mr Mazinga Joseph. The recent case highlights allegations of misconduct, embezzlement, and a potential conspiracy to defraud, emphasizing the need for a more transparent and accountable public service.
On August 12, 2024, Volunteer Uganda Extra Limited addressed a formal letter under Reference No. VUEL/GEN/2024, invoking Article 41(1) and Section 34 of Uganda’s Access to Information Act, 2005. This legislation provides citizens and entities the right to access information held by public offices, fostering transparency and deterring corruption. However, the refusal or delay in furnishing such information is a breach of the law and public trust.
VUL StatementThe letter sought details about financial transactions, approvals, and operational permits for two organizations:
- Volunteer Uganda Extra
- Assessment forms and receipts for UGX 100,000 paid in Lwengo District.
- Attendance lists and minutes approving the issuance of operational permits and certificates of registration.
- Jesus Cares Foundation
- Assessment forms and receipts for fees paid.
- Attendance lists and minutes approving operational permits and certificates of registration.
- Details of the bank where the funds were deposited.
Legal Framework & Non-Compliance
Despite the clear legal provisions under Section 37 of the Access to Information Act, which allows aggrieved parties to lodge a complaint with the Chief Magistrate, the responsible public office has ignored the request. This failure undermines the principles of transparency and public accountability.
The law explicitly states that:
“A person may lodge a complaint with the Chief Magistrate against the decision of an information officer.”
Failure to comply with this provision not only contravenes the law but also reflects poorly on the ethical responsibilities of public officers.
Implications Of Non-Compliance
The refusal or delay in providing the requested information raises serious concerns, including:
- Breach of Public Trust: Public officers are entrusted with the responsibility of serving the public interest. Ignoring such requests erodes confidence in public institutions.
- Potential Criminal Proceedings: Under the law, failure to furnish requested information can lead to criminal charges, further tarnishing the reputation of the individuals and institutions involved.
- Threat to Transparency: Transparency in financial and administrative matters is vital for combating corruption and ensuring the proper use of public funds. Non-compliance threatens the fight against corruption and undermines justice.
Volunteer Uganda Extra Limited, in its commitment to maintaining decorum and upholding the rule of law, has provided the public office a 7-day ultimatum to furnish the requested information. This gesture reflects patience and respect for due process, despite the prolonged delay.
Additionally, the organization has copied the letter to the Chief Administrative Officer, urging immediate intervention by ordering the District Community Development Officer to provide the requested information.
This case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in public service. Public office bearers must remember their duty to serve the people, uphold the law, and ensure the proper use of public resources.
Volunteer Uganda Extra Limited’s unwavering stance against corruption is a beacon of hope for a more accountable Uganda. The next steps, whether compliance or legal action, will set a critical precedent for the enforcement of transparency laws and the fight against impunity.
Read Volunteer Uganda Statement Below In Full
VUL Statement